Greater Latrobe's $9M athletic complex project in 'home stretch'
Construction of Greater Latrobe School District's $9 million athletic complex is in the “home stretch,” according to officials, and a January completion date is expected.
Kurt Thomas, clerk of the works, reported to the school board this week that the weather has slowed completion of the upper multipurpose field, which is about 90 percent complete. Crews need three to four days without snow on the ground to finish the rubber infield, he said.
Other finishing work is under way, including painting and installing doors, ceiling grids, tiles, electrical fixtures and trim, Thomas said.
Final cleanup in the spring will include finish grade work and grass seeding, he said.
“All we want for Christmas is to get your building to you,” Thomas said.
In other business, the board approved the purchase of $22,073 in spring sports equipment from nine vendors. Athletic director Mark Mears said the bids came in about $2,000 under budget.
The board approved notice that it plans to revise the district's tobacco policy.
The policy change includes electronic cigarettes in the list of prohibited tobacco products on school property, said board member Kathryn Elder.
“We have not significantly altered the policy. All that we have done is put in the phrase words ‘electronic cigarettes' as part of the things we don't want our students or our employees to be using on school property,” she said, adding that other districts have similarly included it, while some have more specifically defined tobacco products.
“I always think the more you try to define something, the more likely somebody is to try to find an exception to the definition,” she said.
Stacey Federoff is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-6660 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.