Ligonier YMCA plans still on hold
Ligonier's planning commission voted on Monday to table the Ligonier Valley YMCA's land-use development plan application.
Chairman Joe Willard said because the Y has a meeting scheduled to discuss its plan with residents, as well as another meeting scheduled with a committee composed of borough council and planning commission members to discuss the plan, the board would rather wait to make its recommendation until after any other changes are made to the plan.
Tom Celli, of Celli-Flynn Brennan Architects and Planners, presented renderings of the Y expansion's floor plan, an aerial view of the facility and surrounding area and a street view.
Celli said several tweaks were made to the plan since it was presented to the board in June, including additional windows to bring more natural light into the gymnasium and “simpler roof systems in terms of shape.” He said several storage and equipment rooms were moved from the front to the back of the design to “show off” the gymnasium more, which will be at the intersection of East Church Street and North Market Street.
He said he and his team are looking into bringing out the brick of the pilasters on the existing Y building so it better matches the brick expansion.
Celli said the revised plan is “much more sympathetic architecture to the other public buildings in the town.”
Pending a property survey, Celli also said the plan includes using Wellington Alley as a two-way street for traffic, instead of the plan's original use of Elm Alley for outgoing traffic and Wellington Alley for incoming traffic.
A stormwater management plan for the facility is pending review by borough engineer Ben Faas.
During the meeting, Willard read a letter from attorney Daniel Hewitt that stated solicitor Richard Flickinger could not provide legal counsel regarding the Y's land-use development plan application because he is representing residents Karen McCullough and Gay Wasserman in an appeal filed against the borough.
Flickinger said the appellants feel the borough's vote to approve the Y's requests was not validly passed because “council can't just bring it up and have another vote.”
“If they want to repeal what they've done, they have to go through a new ordinance,” he said. “They can't reject it and later come up and approve it.”
Throughout the meeting, Wasserman and resident Louise Dean questioned the plan, specifically the stormwater management and use of Wellington Alley.
Following discussion between board members, Celli and Sorice, board member Jim McDonnell made the motion to table the plan. Terry Murphy seconded it. Dirk Matson abstained from the vote.
In other business, the board discussed a potential subdivision on a Walnut Street property.
The next meeting will be held 7 p.m. Jan. 27.
Nicole Chynoweth is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-2862 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Irwin Park ball field improvements could move forward
- Institutionalized Westmoreland man, 2 others, file suit, claim lack of programs
- Family of man accused of shooting St. Clair officer say allegations don’t fit his character
- Latrobe City Council OKs sale of Old Athletic Field for new elementary school
- 40 years later, siblings of South Greensburg girl who disappeared still seek closure
- Re-enactor commits to pioneer lifestyle in Murrysville cabin
- Indiana County school employee allegedly showed 2 students an inappropriate photo
- School lunch group hopes to revise rules it calls impractical, too restrictive
- Jeannette trudges through blight
- Contractor eyes early finish to work on New Stanton interchange of Interstate 70
- $2,000 donated for abused puppies recovering at South Huntingdon shelter