Hempfield Area team's engineering prowess captures the gold
Gifted students at Hempfield Area High School brought home the gold from the Chain Reaction Contraption Contest at the Carnegie Science Center in Pittsburgh.
They displayed the winning “Rube's Arcade” on Monday to the school board.
The 28-step contraption begins with a launching device similar to those found on every pinball machine.
And then it's off to the finale — a card that slides down to read “Game Over” and “Thank you for visiting Rube's Arcade.”
Along the way, it's sheer genius with a little bit of whimsy — think Donkey Kong attached to a popsicle stick, a Pac-Man board and Yoshi, a green character from the Super Mario series.
A spinning roller blade sets off one chain reaction that drops Alka-Seltzer into water. That creates carbon-dioxide gas that travels through a tube to press down on the popsicle stick.
Later, some marbles take a roller coaster ride. Air released from a balloon sets Pac-Man off along the maze. And, of course, a mouse trap is involved along the way.
The Hempfield students claimed the top prize in December. The year before, the school's team placed second. In 2011, Hempfield won fourth place after finishing sixth the year before.
Mentoring the team was teacher Tom Harden, the man behind the Hempfield teams, and Westinghouse engineers Tim Johnson, Phil Hawkins and John Vanderhoff and Vocollect engineer Brent Nichols.
On the team are seniors Chase Brannon, Rebecca Donohue, Katie McFadden and Kelly O'Neill; juniors Jon Beranek and KatieVanderhoff; sophomores Timothy Brannon, Crystal Colinear, Morgan Johnson and Chase Pastor, and freshmen Anthony Buskirk, Rachel Capar, Benjamin Lawson, Jacob Mursch, Colin Phillips, Margaret Vanderhoff and Tate Yawitz.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.