Ligonier official steps down again
Ligonier borough councilwoman Kim Shaffer resigned from her post effective Jan. 9, the second time she has left a vacancy on the panel.
At council's monthly meeting on Thursday, president Judy Hoffer read a letter of resignation from Shaffer, who was not present at the meeting.
Shaffer did not provide a reason for her resignation in the letter. She had taken her newly elected seat at council's reorganization meeting Jan. 6.
Shaffer had announced her resignation from her previous term at an Oct. 29 meeting, but council adjourned before voting on it.
At council's Nov. 14 meeting, councilmen Robert Helterbran, James St. Clair and Tom Freeman voted to accept the resignation, while Hoffer, Bob Bell and Jim McDonnell voted against accepting it. Mayor Ormond Bellas broke the tie, voting to accept her resignation.
Shaffer responded to the vote by stating she had intended to take back her resignation that night.
According to the state borough code, council must fill the vacant seat within 30 days. Those wishing to serve on council may mail letters of interest to Hoffer at the borough building, 120 East Main Street, Ligonier, PA 15658.
Hoffer said council is also accepting letters of interest to fill a vacancy on the zoning board.
Council will hold a special meeting at 7 p.m. Jan. 30 to vote on both appointments.
Nicole Chynoweth is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
She can be reached at 724-850-2862 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.