Greensburg traffic stop yields $3K in heroin
Two McKeesport men were jailed because officers who stopped their vehicle on Saturday evening discovered they had about $3,000 worth of suspected heroin, police said.
Gerald R. Lawrence, 23, and Shannon Williams, 18, were charged with possession of a controlled substance, possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance and criminal conspiracy. Greensburg police and Westmoreland County detectives made the traffic stop.
City police Detective Jerry Vernail and county Detective Tony Marcocci reported in an affidavit of probable cause that they received information from a confidential informant on Friday that two men were selling heroin from an apartment on North Pittsburgh Street in Greensburg, and the alleged distributors intended to return to the city to sell more heroin on Saturday.
City police conducted a traffic stop at West Pittsburgh Street and Westminster Avenue about 4:30 p.m. Saturday, according the affidavit.
“The occupants were patted down for officer safety, and Lawrence was found to have a white plastic bag in his right sock and pant leg. That bag contained 189 bags of heroin,” Vernail wrote in the affidavit.
Police subsequently discovered 50 small plastic bags of suspected heroin, called stamp bags, tucked in Williams' pants as he was processed, 50 bags in the area where he was sitting on the prisoner bench in the police station and 50 more bags tucked in the police cruiser where he sat as he was taken to the station.
In all, police recovered 334 stamp bags with a street value of $8 to $10 per bag.
Lawrence and Williams were ordered held in the county prison after failing to post $75,000 bond set by Night Court District Judge Frank Pallone.
Preliminary hearings are tentatively scheduled for Jan. 23 before Greensburg District Judge James Albert.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.