Sewickley Township winery's plan gets approval
A Sewickley Township winery owner won local approval Wednesday to proceed with his plans for a $1 million project that will give him a new retails sales building containing a banquet hall and a new wine production building.
The Sewickley Township Zoning Hearing Board unanimously approved Gregory Hazuza's request for a special exception to the zoning ordinance to construct the two new buildings on a 29.7-acre parcel zoned for agricultural purposes.
Peter Cherellia, zoning board chairman, said the construction of the buildings for a winery is a permitted use in land zoned for agriculture.
Hazuza said he wants to begin construction the buildings on April 1 and hopes to have a grand opening for the retails sales building on Labor Day weekend.
The 5,472-square-foot retails sales and banquet hall and the 3,200-square-foot wine production building are planned for a hilltop about one-quarter mile from Hazuza's production warehouse along Pinewood Road.
Greenhouse Winery customers are able to sample and buy his wine at his family's greenhouse off the Guffey Rillton Road in Sewickley. Hazuza said in his application that his business is outgrowing that site.
In his application for the zoning approval, Hazuza said he hopes to create between 12 and 15 jobs and to increase wine production to 14,000 gallons this year, from 11,000 gallons last year.
Joe Napsha is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.