Mt. Pleasant man accused of assaulting 5-year-old girl
Indecent assault charges have been filed against a Mt. Pleasant man who is accused of inappropriately touching a 5-year-old girl.
Jeffrey Allan May, 47, of 320 Spruce St. was charged with indecent assault and endangering the welfare of children before District Judge Helen M. Kistler on Feb. 6.
According to an affidavit of probable cause, the girl's mother told Mt. Pleasant Police that her daughter was rubbing her private area after she returned to her home on Oct. 2, 2013. May had been baby-sitting the girl that day.
When the mother questioned the child about her actions, the girl indicated May was rubbing her in that area.
On Oct. 18, May was interviewed by police and stated he never touched the girl in any appropriate way. When asked by police if he was interested in taking a voice stress test, May stated he would.
However, on Oct. 21, police were told by May that his attorney advised him not to take the voice stress test and to not talk to the police any longer.
Police were advised by a Children and Youth Services worker that during a forensic interview with the girl, she said May had placed his hands inside her underwear and inappropriately rubbed her in her private area and that had occurred every time May would baby-sit her and when nobody else was present, according to the complaint.
A preliminary hearing for May has been scheduled before District Judge Roger Eckels at 10:15 a.m. March 6. May is free on $10,000 bond.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.