Latrobe council eyes neighborhood watch program
Latrobe City Council plans to consider a measure to reinstate a neighborhood watch program after working with police Chief Jim Bumar and Councilwoman Julie Bisi.
The program, planned for a vote on Monday, will not require time or funding from the police department, except for early organization and training meetings, Bumar said.
Residents will be needed to volunteer as block captains to lead the program, he said.
“It's the community's project; the community will run it,” Bumar said.
Attempts have been made to sustain a similar program, but they faltered as interest waned, Councilman Mike Skapura said.
Skapura said he met with representatives from Pennsylvania Downtown Center, a nonprofit focused on revitalization of communities and their central business districts, and discussed funding to keep the program successful.
“They are working with several communities in Pennsylvania to assist them with programs just like this,” he said, encouraging cooperation between the police, city officials and residents.
The nonprofit lauded community-based programs such as a neighborhood watch and relayed information about offering financial assistance through grants, Skapura said.
In other business, Mayor Rosie Wolford reviewed council members' positions on each of the newly formed committees: Gerry Baldonieri and Madalyn Smith, public works; Smith and Skapura, finance; Fabian Giovannagelo and Bisi, public safety; Trisha Caldwell-Cravener and Gerry Baldonieri, community development; and Caldwell-Cravener and Skapura, personnel.
Stacey Federoff is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-6660 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.