Burglary suspect reportedly strips, urinates on floor
A Penn Township man under arrest for burglary allegedly urinated on the floor of the township police department while officers were processing him.
Ronald Eugene Venturella, 36, is facing charges for allegedly taking multiple items from a Long Drive home on Thursday. A witness reported to Westmoreland 911 at 6:25 p.m. that a man wearing a black knit cap and a dark coat was dragging a set of golf clubs from the residence, according to an affidavit of probable cause filed on Friday.
When Patrolman Nathan Johnston arrived, the man, later identified as Venturella, allegedly ran from the scene but was caught after a short pursuit.
Police found numerous items in Venturella's possession, including jewelry, Army uniform buttons, dog tags, tools, extension cords, stamps, a stainless steel coffee set, and personal documents with the homeowner's last name printed on them, according to the complaint. Police said the items are valued at $1,000.
Police found drawers open throughout the home, but Venturella told officers he found the items outside the house.
While police were processing Venturella at the police department, he allegedly removed his clothes, walked into a cell and shut the door.
“(He) proceeded to intentionally urinate out the cell door onto the hallway floor,” Detective Tod DeNillo wrote in the complaint.
Venturella is charged with burglary, criminal trespass, theft, receiving stolen property, criminal mischief and institutional vandalism. He was arraigned on Friday morning before District Judge Helen Kistler and lodged in the Westmoreland County Prison in lieu of $25,000 bail.
A preliminary hearing is set for March 11.
Renatta Signorini is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-837-5374 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.