Police: South Union man fired assault rifle in basement to 'blow off some steam'
A Fayette County man told police he was angry and needed to “blow off some steam” when he fired three shots into his basement floor early Wednesday after arguing with his girlfriend, police said.
Walter Everett Richardson III, 26, of South Union allegedly fired an AR-15 rifle about 2:20 a.m. while a 4-month-old baby was inside, according to an affidavit of probable cause.
The girlfriend and a 2-year-old child were outside when the shots were fired and when police arrived.
State troopers and Uniontown police officers recovered the firearm from the basement, but no one was inside.
Investigators canvassed the area, but Richardson turned himself in at the Uniontown police department.
Richardson told a city officer that he argued with the woman but didn't hit her, according to the affidavit.
“Richardson also related that he was so upset over the situation that he had went to the basement to get away,” Trooper Jason Delaini wrote in the complaint.
The argument apparently started about 2 a.m. when, the woman told police, Richardson returned home from a bar.
The woman told police that Richardson punched her in the face, head and arms. The infant and the other child were not harmed, police said.
Richardson is charged with three counts each of aggravated assault and reckless endangerment, two counts of endangering the welfare of children and single counts of terroristic threats, harassment and simple assault.
He is being held in the Fayette County Prison on $75,000 bail.
A preliminary hearing is scheduled on Wednesday before South Union District Justice Wendy Dennis.
Renatta Signorini is a staff writer at Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-837-5374.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.