ShareThis Page

Judge will decide ownership of old Jeannette Glass site

Rich Cholodofsky
| Monday, March 24, 2014, 11:50 p.m.

A 13-acre industrial site in Jeannette that has been idle for three decades could be put into use if it's returned to its New York-based former owners, a lawyer said Monday.

But county and city officials countered that history suggests the one-time owners of the Jeannette Glass Co. property will never make good on a decades-old promise to restore the sprawling site to an industrial venture generating jobs and tax revenue.

The land was the subject of a nonjury trial on Monday before Westmoreland County Judge Anthony Marsili, who will decide if the sale of the property for back taxes nearly two years ago will stand. Marsili said he won't rule on the issue until he receives written legal arguments in early May.

In September 2012, the Westmoreland County Industrial Development Corp. purchased the site for $305,000, as the property was sold by the county because of delinquent taxes.

According to tax records, Zion Bullitt Avenue Ltd. owed more than $11,000 to the county, more than $17,000 to the City of Jeannette and more than $44,800 to the school district for three years running.

“We're going to develop it,” said Aaron Kress, a lawyer for Zion Bullitt, the New York-based partnership that owned the property. “ ... If they (Zion) keep the property, all the back taxes are going to be paid quite quickly.”

The company was founded by New York developer Abe Zion, who purchased the site in 1983 out of bankruptcy with promises to build a glass plant featuring cutting-edge technology. The state gave Zion $1.2 million in grants and low-interest loans, but the plant never reopened.

Years of unsuccessful efforts to get Zion to sell or rehabilitate the site followed, but it was not until county officials stepped in to purchase the property in the tax sale that movement finally occurred.

Zion is now under a court order to comply with a state Department of Environmental Protection edict to clean up the property.

“We want to get the site cleaned up and if successful here (in purchasing the property), get the site back into productive use,” said Jason Rigone, executive director of the county's industrial development authority.

Jeannette solicitor Scott Avolio said Zion's promise to rehabilitate and sell the property has been heard before.

“That representation has been made decade after decade after decade by the Zions. There has been 25 years of no movement,” Avolio said.

Marisili will ultimately decide who owns the property.

In court on Monday, lawyers for Zion said the company never received official and certified documentation from the county that the property was subject to a tax sale.

Mark Zion, the company's managing partner and son of Abe Zion, testified that he and his 89-year-old father, who was ill, were out of the country when a certified letter of the proposed sale arrived at the family's home in the Bronx.

Mark Zion said the pair traveled to the U.S. Virgin Islands to celebrate a birthday in early May 2012.

Records introduced into evidence on Monday indicated a certified letter about the sale, signed for by someone at the Zion home, was delivered on May 14, 2012.

Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.