Brain hemorrhage blamed in Penn Township man's death in Jamaica
A man awaiting trial on vehicular homicide charges in Westmoreland County died last weekend in Jamaica from a brain hemorrhage caused by high blood pressure and substance abuse, according to autopsy results released on Tuesday.
A Jamaican police spokesman said officials have ordered toxicology tests to learn more about the death of David McCormick, 43, of Penn Township, who was found floating in the water near the resort where he was vacationing in Negril.
McCormick was scheduled to stand trial in August on charges of homicide by vehicle and driving under the influence after he rammed the rear of a car driven by Francis Cossick, 66, of Camp Hill, Cumberland County, in December on Route 22 in Murrysville. Cossick died in the accident.
McCormick could have served three to six years in prison if convicted of the charges.
Murrysville police determined McCormick was traveling 107 mph in a 45-mph zone when he hit Cossick's vehicle.
He had been free on $25,000 bond.
Attorney Barney McArdle of Greensburg, a family spokesman, said the McCormick family received the same report from Jamaican police on Tuesday.
McCormick was vacationing in Jamaica at a resort on the western end of the island that overlooks the Caribbean Sea.
He was the son of Greensburg attorney Tim McCormick, who died in 2012, and a nephew of Westmoreland County President Judge Richard McCormick Jr.
Richard Gazarik is a staff writerfor Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.