Latrobe couple charged with shoving guard, stealing from Wal-Mart
A Latrobe couple have been charged with robbery, harassment and retail theft for allegedly shoving a security guard at a Wal-Mart store in North Huntingdon while attempting to flee without paying for several video games.
Jacob J. Ferry, 24, and Diedre R. Yezerski, 27, both of Latrobe, were ordered held in the Westmoreland County Prison when they failed to post $10,000 bond apiece for the theft of several Xbox games at 12:36 p.m. March 29, court records show.
North Huntingdon police Officer Jay Kettren said the security guard saw Yezerski conceal several Xbox games valued at $120 in her purse and watched Ferry stuff several games inside his pants before they attempted to leave the store without paying, according to an affidavit of probable cause.
When the guard stopped Yezerski, Ferry “grabbed the security guard” and shoved him so the couple could run out of the store, Kettren alleges in the affidavit filed before North Huntingdon District Judge Douglas Weimer. The guard was able to hold onto Yezerski's purse, which contained her identification.
Authorities were able to identify the couple through her driver's license and social media, where she listed Ferry as her fiance.
Latrobe police later charged Ferry with stealing three checks from his grandmother in February. He allegedly cashed them at an express check cashing business on Route 30 in North Versailles in Allegheny County, according to an affidavit filed before Unity District Judge Michael Mahady by Sgt. Nunzio Santo Columbo of the Latrobe department.
A preliminary hearing before Weimer on the robbery charges is tentatively scheduled for April 30.
Paul Peirce is a staff writerfor Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-850-2860 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.