Final suspect in Antoniak's Market robbery placed on parole
The last of three men charged in the armed robbery of Antoniak's Market in Jeannette more than two years ago pleaded guilty on Thursday to lesser charges.
Marielli A. McGowan, 23, of Jeannette was then sentenced to serve up to 23 months in jail. He was given credit for eight days he served in jail after his arrest and was immediately paroled by Westmoreland County Judge Richard E. McCormick Jr.
“The most important part of the plea is the defendant has to stay away from the victims,” said Assistant District Attorney Wayne Gongaware.
Police said McGowan and two friends stormed the small market on Dec. 11, 2011, and left with $71.
Witnesses said McGowan brandished a gun during the heist and fled as police pursued the three men after the robbery.
McGowan was identified by one of the suspects who was captured by police.
“He got caught up in the wrong crowd and started a long slide,” defense attorney Milton Raiford said in court. “I think he's back on a good foot.”
McGowan pleaded guilty to lesser charges of theft and receiving stolen property. Prosecutors dismissed a more serious charge of robbery and conspiracy in return for the guilty plea.
Nathaniel Crawford, 20, of Jeannette was sentenced in late 2012 to 11 1⁄2 to 23 months in jail and two years' probation for standing lookout during the heist.
Eric Johnson, 21, formerly of Lancaster, pleaded guilty in March 2012 to robbery and was sentenced by Judge Al Bell to 18 to 36 months in prison.
Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.