Monessen woman rejects plea deal, will stand trial
A Monessen woman will stand trial for her alleged role in the attempted murder of a man outside his home in December 2012.
Samone Stepoli, 22, rejected a plea bargain on Tuesday that would have her serve one year on probation and six months on house arrest.
Stepoli was accused along with her two brothers and two other men of involvement in the attempted shooting of 19-year-old Jaisen Irwin in Monessen. Police contend Samone Stepoli drove the car that took the group to the scene of the shooting.
Defense attorney Patricia Elliott said Stepoli rejected a deal that would have dismissed the more serious felony charges she faces and in return was asked to plead guilty to a misdemeanor charge of conspiracy to commit simple assault.
“She believes she did not do anything wrong and wants to exercise her right to a trial,” Elliott said.
Stepoli's brothers, Joshua Stepoli, 20, and Terrance Stepoli, 21, along with Antoine Hairston, 20, all of Monessen, pleaded guilty on Monday to a charge of aggravated assault and were sentenced to 17 to 48 months in jail and one year on house arrest. All three were paroled because they have served their minimum sentences.
Earl Pinkney, 20, of Monessen is awaiting trial on charges in connection with the alleged attempt on Irwin.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.