Greensburg man pulls knife on estranged wife, police say
A Greensburg man who pulled a knife on his estranged wife and another man ended up in the Westmoreland County prison on $50,000 bail on Wednesday, city police said.
Colin Nicholas Kurincak, 35, was charged with two counts each of aggravated assault and terroristic threats in Greensburg District Judge James Albert's office.
Kurincak used the kitchen knife with a 6- or 7-inch blade to bang on the driver's window of a vehicle and demand that his wife's friend come out to fight Tuesday morning in the Autumn Brook Apartments parking lot, police said.
The two alleged victims were in the vehicle shortly after midnight and had locked the doors when they saw Kurincak in the parking lot, Patrolman Robert Shapiro said in court papers.
After the altercation, Kurincak went into an apartment, leaving the knife about 15 feet from the vehicle, police said.
Authorities reported seeing smudges on the driver's window.
Earlier, city police went to the apartment complex because Kurincak and his wife were arguing over divorcing, according to the criminal complaint.
After police arrived, the couple agreed to go their separate ways.
About 30 minutes later, Kurincak returned and began arguing with his wife. He threatened to cut up a mattress with a knife, authorities said.
He went downstairs, and the wife called her male friend to come and pick her up, police said. Kurincak then encountered the couple in the vehicle in the parking lot.
Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.