ShareThis Page

Peers: Attorney for Franklin Regional suspect 'as good as they get'

| Sunday, June 8, 2014, 11:06 p.m.
Patrick Thomassey, defense attorney for stabbing suspect Alex Hribal, conducts a live interview on Thursday morning, April 10, 2014. Hribal, 16, allegedly stabbed 21 students and a security guard at Franklin Regional Senior High School.
Sean Stipp | Tribune-Review
Patrick Thomassey, defense attorney for stabbing suspect Alex Hribal, conducts a live interview on Thursday morning, April 10, 2014. Hribal, 16, allegedly stabbed 21 students and a security guard at Franklin Regional Senior High School.

A Duquesne University basketball-player-turned-prosecutor for Allegheny County stood in front of a jury about 40 years ago and cleared the air: “Yes, I am 6-foot-10.”

When it was time for the defense to address the panel, attorney Patrick Thomassey stood up, leaned into the jury box and declared: “In case you haven't noticed, I'm not.”

The exchange was a classic example of Thomassey's sense of humor and ability to think quickly, his friends and colleagues said. Those traits, in addition to his work ethic and integrity, make him one of the area's top criminal defense lawyers, they said.

“There may well be no better lawyer in the state, maybe the country, than he is,” said Common Pleas President Judge Jeffrey A. Manning.

Thomassey, 65, of Monroeville represents Alex Hribal, 16, the Franklin Regional High School student accused of taking two 8-inch knives to school and using them to stab a security guard and 20 students in a first-floor hallway just before classes started on April 9.

Thomassey knows he'll be under the microscope.

“This is the kind of case I'm going to be criticized for, whatever I do,” he said. “I'm just trying to do what's best for this young kid. This was a good, solid American family who are flabbergasted by this whole situation.”

Thomassey grew up in Turtle Creek, fewer than 10 miles from Franklin Regional.

He became an assistant district attorney in 1975 upon graduating from Western State College of Colorado and Duquesne Law and made a name for himself prosecuting Richard Henkel, a Hampton man suspected of committing as many as 32 murders and plotting to kidnap Steelers owner Art Rooney Sr. for ransom.

A decade later — when he switched to criminal defense — Thomassey represented Brentwood police Lt. Milton E. Mulholland, who with two other white police officers, was charged with killing Jonny Gammage, a black motorist, in a racially charged incident that divided the city. District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. dropped the charges against the officers after two mistrials.

“I got a lot of satisfaction from that case because everybody in the world had those guys convicted,” Thomassey said.

Edgewood police Chief Robert Payne, a former county police detective who was the lead investigator on the Henkel case, praised Thomassey's efforts. The two traveled to Los Angeles and parts of Canada gathering evidence to build the case.

“If you're going up against Pat, you better do your homework. You'd better be sharp,” Payne said. “If I was ever in trouble, he'd be the first person I'd call.”

Going up against Thomassey always was a challenge, said Garry A. Nelson, the former college basketball-player-turned- prosecutor.

“He's a tenacious lawyer who fights like crazy and knows how to try a case,” Nelson said.

Former Assistant Public Defender Gary Gentile said Thomassey's ability to step back and apply the law within a “life context” has been critical to his success.

“He understands life and the law, and he gets the big picture,” Gentile said. “In the criminal law field, he's as good as they get.”

Thomassey said he doesn't try to be “magical,” just forthright and honest.

“For me, being a lawyer is not a job. It's a commitment. You have to be committed to your clients,” he said.

Adam Brandolph is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-391-0927 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.