Art added to Westmoreland County Courthouse conference room
Marli Van Horne took up painting in high school just to help calm her nerves.
Now the 27-year-old Irwin resident has her framed painting of a covered bridge hanging on a wall in the Westmoreland County Courthouse in Greensburg.
“It feels great, and it's amazing,” Van Horne said Thursday during a reception unveiling four works of art being displayed in a commissioners conference room.
The artists are clients of the county's department of Behavioral Health and Development Services.
Jamie Boehme, a program specialist for the department, said the paintings were first displayed in an art show earlier this year for residents with intellectual challenges.
“We want to show the community that individuals with intellectual disabilities have a lot to offer,” Boehme said.
The works now on display were added to about a half-dozen pictures collected by county commissioners in 2012.
Artists featured this year are Keri McKenna of Irwin, whose yellow rose was painted using a brush attached to a head band to compensate for limited use of her hands because of cerebral palsy; Richard “RJ” Kacsuta of Unity, who painted a seascape; Van Horne's covered bridge, and a colorful abstract piece from Ian Mannard of Hempfield.
Mannard, 22, has been painting for six months, according to his father, Joe, who attended Thursday's unveiling.
“He's been reluctant to go out so this is one thing he does at home to relieve some of this anxiety. It's been helping. I think he's pleased,” Mannard said.
Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.