Share This Page

Catholics, Anglicans will set aside differences as St. Vincent College hosts archbishop ceremony

| Thursday, June 26, 2014, 2:30 p.m.
Steph Chambers | Tribune-Review
Members of the Anglican Church in North America sing the hymn 'And Can It Be?' during an early eucharist on Wednesday, June 25, 2014 at St. Vincent College's Basilica in Unity township. This weekend, the Right Rev. Dr. Foley Beach of the Diocese of the South will succeed the Most Rev. Robert Duncan of Pittsburgh, the church’s first archbishop.

As Robert Duncan pondered where he might hand over his power as archbishop of the Anglican Church in North America to a new leader, St. Vincent College near Latrobe seemed to be the obvious choice.

It was obvious to Duncan, but maybe not to others who know about the centuries of bitter strife between the Catholic Church and the Anglicans.

But given Duncan's friendship with St. Vincent Archabbot Douglas Nowicki and the fact that his primary residence is not far away in Donegal, he thought the Catholic college was the perfect place to say goodbye and transfer power to the Right Rev. Foley Beach of the Diocese of the South.

Beach was elected to the post on Sunday at the start of a weeklong assembly at the college.

Duncan's farewell occurs just one week after Pope Francis and the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, leader of the Church of England and symbolic head of the world's Anglicans, met in Rome, where the pope said unifying the churches “should direct our every step along the way.”

Until the 16th century, the two churches were in communion. The Church of England broke away from the pope's authority during the English Reformation.

Six years ago, 40 Western Pennsylvania parishes led by Duncan left the Episcopal Diocese of Pittsburgh in opposition to the U.S. leadership's support for the 2003 consecration of an openly gay pastor as bishop of New Hampshire. Biblical teaching on salvation and other issues were other factors in the split. Eventually, Duncan was elected to be the first leader of the North American Anglicans.

On Wednesday, Duncan reflected on those who said it would never work.

“One of the things that I think you know as part of the story is that many folks, our critics in particular, said we would never be able to elect a second archbishop,” Duncan said during the assembly that will culminate with Saturday's “transfer of spiritual authority” from Duncan to Beach.

When the split occurred, Duncan issued a challenge to “plant,” or establish, 1,000 Anglican congregations in North America by 2014. To date, 488 new parishes have been formed, the Rev. Alan Hawkins, canon for church planting, said during the assembly.

Duncan will continue to serve in his role as bishop of the Anglican Diocese of Pittsburgh.

“This is an exciting time in the life of North American Anglicans,” Duncan said.

“Anglicism in the 1960s was terribly fractured over various issues and accommodations of the culture. ... This movement was to bring our family back together.”

And he feels confident that Beach will carry on the mission he began.

“I count it a real joy and sacred trust to be elected as the archbishop of Anglican Church in North America,” Beach said. “I believe leadership is stewardship. ... Leadership is also temporary, and leadership also has accountability.”

More than 900 people — an international mix of laypeople and clergy — have participated in the weeklong assembly. It will conclude with a Eucharist at 10 a.m. Saturday in St. Vincent Basilica.

Mary Pickels is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-5401 or mpickels@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.