Greensburg Salem OKs budget with 1.25-mill tax hike
Lengthy debate led to last-minute budget cuts by the Greensburg Salem school board Wednesday night, resulting in a final budget that will raise property taxes by 1.25 mills, instead of the 1.5 mills that was originally brought to the table.
The final $41.74 million budget was reached by cutting a vacant associate principal position at the high school. This position was vacated earlier this year by Lisa Hauswirth, who was promoted last year to acting director of student and district services. Instead of filling the position, the district will instead replace it with a dean, who will teach a class half time and receive smaller compensation.
The board originally met to vote on a $41.82 million budget, which would have raised property taxes by 1.5 mills.
This was voted down 4-5. The board then went into a lengthy executive session behind closed doors and emerged to vote on the new budget with little public discussion. This passed 5-3.
Board member Stephen Thomas was attending the meeting by phone. He voted in favor of the original budget but his connection was lost before the second vote.
Even this failed budget was not the first proposed by the school. Administrators last week cut $378,000 from a budget that would have raised taxes by 1.75 mills.
The approved $41.74 million budget will be covered by about $40.78 million in revenue, with the remaining money coming from the district's fund balance. The total millage is 82.46.
“It was a very, very difficult budget year,” said Superintendent Eileen Amato, who attributed much of the rising costs to government-mandated expenses, such as retirement costs.
“I think the board did a very good job of trying to meet the needs of the students with the money we have.”
Jacob Tierney is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6646 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Woman charged with assault spree in Jeannette
- Jeannette pleads for more state help
- 2 suspects charged with second robbery in Hempfield
- Jeannette purse-snatching suspects to stand trial in 5 incidents
- Former Pagans leader works out plea agreement
- Sutersville principal’s comments taken out of context, district claims
- Treatment ponds for mine drainage planned for Unity
- Southmoreland High School junior’s broken jaw ‘could have been avoided’
- Donegal Township families fight driller to get clean water
- Police: Penn Township man was ‘lonely,’ so he called 911
- Greensburg finalizes deal to provide sign language interpreter for soccer program