Share This Page

Greensburg coach charged with corruption of minors

| Friday, June 27, 2014, 12:01 a.m.

A track and field coach allegedly sent inappropriate text messages to a 15-year-old girl and repeatedly asked her to dinner, according to police.

Anthony Louis Boerio, 53, of South Greensburg is facing two misdemeanor counts of corruption of minors.

Westmoreland County Detective Robert Weaver said Boerio met the girl at the Greensburg YMCA, where he was working. The teenager learned that Boerio was a track coach and asked if he could recommend some strength exercises, according to an affidavit of probable cause.

The pair exchanged telephone numbers, police said.

During an April 17 interview, the girl told Weaver that text messages from Boerio “became creepy” and she blocked his number and went to a different gym, the affidavit states.

Some of the messages the girl received between February and March that were reported to police said: “Speaking of scary, I was wondering what you look like when you wake up in the morning. I'd like to find out” and “If you get stuck at school just hike over to my place.”

Boerio resigned as an assistant coach with the Penn-Trafford High School track team in May.

Boerio could not be reached for comment on Thursday.

During an interview with detectives on April 24, Boerio said he “may have taken (the girl's) attention the wrong way,” according to the affidavit.

Boerio told police he remembered some of the messages and did not deny sending them, Weaver wrote in the affidavit.

A summons has been issued and a July 31 preliminary hearing is scheduled. Boerio does not have an attorney listed in online court records.

Renatta Signorini is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-837-5374 or rsignorini@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.