ShareThis Page

Tunnelton Liquids cleanup plan to be presented

Paul Peirce
| Tuesday, July 1, 2014, 12:01 a.m.

The state Department of Environmental Protection will present a cleanup plan on Tuesday for a wastewater disposal pond along the Conemaugh River at the border of Indiana and Westmoreland counties.

A public hearing will be at 6:30 p.m. at the Tunnelton Volunteer Fire Department, 76 E. Third Ave. in Tunnelton.

The DEP invoked the state's Hazardous Sites Cleanup Act to take over the former Tunnelton Liquids Co.

The site includes a holding pond with treated leachate from a coal refuse disposal area and wastewater from oil and gas drilling activities.

The company ceased operation on April 17, the DEP said.

“We're very concerned about some of those materials in the pond escaping over the riverbank and possibly entering the river,” DEP spokesman John Poister said. “They literally just shut the gates and walked away.”

Messages left on the company's answering machine on Tuesday were not returned.

The company, which was formed to treat acid mine drainage from an abandoned deep mine, had been accepting Marcellus shale wastewater until state regulators asked it to cease. In a May 2011 letter, the federal Environmental Protection Agency told the company that injection of acid mine drainage with “oil field brine” is not authorized.

Poister said some work has been done at the site.

“The agency believes that there is an imminent threat to human health and the environment if the water and sludge from a pond on the site were to overflow into the river, which is why we have taken this action. We have already begun some preliminary work there,” he said.

During the hearing, officials will explain the work that will be done, hold a question-and-answer session and accept testimony from area residents who want their concerns included in the official record.

Anyone who wants to be placed on the agenda may contact the DEP office in Pittsburgh at 412-442-4203.

There will be an opportunity to register at the fire department before the hearing, and the DEP will accept written comments until Aug. 22.

Melissa Reckner, director of the Conemaugh Valley Conservancy's stream team whose mission is to enhance and restore the Kiski-Conemaugh River Basin, said she is anxious to hear the cleanup plans.

“I wish we would have heard about this meeting a lot sooner, but we are very concerned about it. We do understand the (DEP's) understaffing and funding concerns, but waiting two months before presenting a formal plan and just letting a company walk away from a problem is unacceptable ... particularly given the wet spring we had here,” she said.

“We are water-rich in Pennsylvania, which is what makes Pennsylvania such a great state, but we've got to take better care of this valuable resource. We'll be anxious to hear what the exact plans are,” she said.

Poister said he believes that the state “will go after” the company in an attempt to recoup cleanup costs.

“But our main and immediate concern at this point is the cleanup of the pond on that property and making sure it does not go into the Conemaugh,” he said.

“As soon as we finalize the plan and take into consideration all the public comment and questions, we'll let a contract and have them go right to work on it. But ... we've been up there literally every day and have already done some preliminary work,” he said.

Those unable to attend the meeting can send comments in writing to: Terry Goodwald, Project Manager, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, 400 Waterfront Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15222.

For more information, go to

Paul Peirce is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-850-2860 or at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.