Share This Page

Irwin man faces charges after altercation

| Sunday, July 6, 2014, 7:21 p.m.

An Irwin man was charged with aggravated assault Saturday after he allegedly pointed a shotgun at a Salem man and woman and threatened to kill them.

Police said Joseph Stoll Jr., 18, went to a Salem residence at 1:25 p.m., where he got into an altercation with a 40-year-old man.

Police identified the older man as Stoll's girlfriend's father.

After the man told Stoll to leave, Stoll pushed him, police said. The man then struck Stoll and again ordered him to leave, police said.

Stoll got into his vehicle and drove a short distance before stopping and retrieving a 12-gauge shotgun from his car. Stoll racked the pump-action shotgun and pointed it at the man and a 38-year-old woman and said he was going to kill them, police said.

Stoll's girlfriend then got between him and the man and woman and persuaded Stoll to leave, police said.

Additional charges of simple assault, reckless endangerment and terroristic threats were filed against Stoll.

He was arraigned Sunday before District Judge Joseph A. Dalfonso.

Stoll was placed in the Westmoreland County jail after being unable to post $15,000 bail.

He faces a preliminary hearing July 14 before Washington Township District Judge Jason Buczak.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.