Share This Page

2 pets succumb in North Huntingdon house fire

| Sunday, July 6, 2014, 10:09 p.m.

At least two pets died and close to 20 were rescued from a North Huntingdon house that was damaged by a fire Sunday night while the owner was away from her home, officials said.

Sixteen pets were rescued from the house at 1910 Robbins Station Road and were transported to AVETS, an emergency veterinary care hospital in Monroeville, and Westmoreland County animal rescue and recovery organization was contacted to provide assistance, said Bill Sombo, first assistant fire chief of the Circleville fire department.

The cause of the fire that damaged Karen Sapochak's home remains under investigation, Sombo said. Several units from North Huntingdon and Irwin responded to the fire, which was reported at 7:54 p.m..

The house sustained smoke damage, which Sapochak said she believed killed at least one cat and one poodle. A lizard inside a cage was rescued and a Rescue 8 emergency medical technician provided oxygen inside an oxygen mask to a parakeet that was found in the basement, Sapochak said.

Sapochak said she was told that the fire began at the kitchen stove and she speculated that a cat turned on the burner of the gas stove.

Sapochak said she was shopping at the time of the fire and learned that the fire was at her house from firefighters providing traffic control.

“I'm not going to scream or yell (about the fire). I can face anything,” Sapochak said.

She said she would stay with her sister, Diane Marie Hewitt, who also lives in North Huntingdon.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.