Outcry halts tree cutting in South Greensburg park
Tree cutting at South Greensburg Community Park has come to a halt — at least for now.
The timbering stopped on Tuesday, according to Deb Muse, president of a citizens committee formed in opposition to logging the oak and hickory trees.
“They have temporarily stopped,” Muse said on Thursday. “They do have a proposal they want to present to the community that they think will make us happy. ... What the proposal is, I have no idea.”
The proposal is to be presented when council meets at 6 p.m. Monday.
The tree cutting “is on hold,” said Councilman Bob Thomas, who met with some of the residents this week. “I talked with the people, and we have an idea. We're going to present it then and see what they (council members) think.”
Thomas declined to reveal the proposal.
About 20 people packed council chambers on Monday to protest Mt. View Lumber of Smicksburg, Indiana County, harvesting the trees in exchange for payment of $10,000. That's too low, residents and forester Bill Paxton contend.
Council planned to use the proceeds to make improvements in the park, Thomas and council President Clentin Martin said.
The contract does not specify how many trees are to be cut.
Muse said she has received numerous calls since Monday's meeting from others who opposing cutting down the mature trees.
Thomas, who said he knows other residents who support the timbering, estimated that about 70 trees have been felled.
Council wanted to cut the trees to get rid of dead ones and bring more sunlight to the area to stop moss or lichen from growing on buildings, Thomas said.
Some trees need to go so restrooms can be moved closer to pavilions, Martin said last month.
Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.