South Greensburg woman charged in home repairs case
An arrest warrant has been issued for a South Greensburg woman accused by Westmoreland County detectives of taking down payments for home repairs and not completing the work.
Katina D. Stewart, 41, allegedly has not repaid about $5,000 to three Hempfield Township residents, according to criminal complaints filed by Detective Will Brown. Stewart operates Stewart & Company Home Improvements of Greensburg, Brown said.
A Moore Lane couple reported that they made a down payment of $2,570 in May for the removal and replacement of four sliding glass doors at their home. A Farm Brook Drive woman made a $2,500 down payment in April for a new roof, according to the complaint. Work was never done in either instance.
Stewart is charged with two counts of receiving an advance payment and failing to complete work before District Judge Charles Moore. The Farm Brook Drive resident has received $1,000, Brown said.
Stewart faces access device fraud and theft charges filed by North Huntingdon police in connection with another alleged home repair scam. An affidavit of probable cause states that a Clay Pike Road woman was checking on whether about $8,000 in home repairs would be covered under her insurance. In the meantime, she gave Stewart her credit card number to use only if the repairs would be covered.
The victim decided not to do the repairs and learned that her credit card had been used to obtain $7,000 by Stewart & Company Home Improvements without her permission between May 19 and June 6.
Stewart is free on $2,500 unsecured bail in that case. A preliminary hearing before District Judge Douglas Weimer is set for Wednesday.
Renatta Signorini is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-837-5374 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.