Westmoreland County Prison to start video visits
Video visits at Westmoreland County Prison are expected to begin sometime in August, Warden John Walton told the prison board on Monday.
Equipment has been installed in several units at the jail, and a two-week free visit period will occur before the system officially goes online, hopefully no later than Sept. 1, Walton said.
“There will be some type of a trial period,” he said.
Board members voted in March to install the system that could generate hundreds of thousands of dollars in revenue for the county over the next five years. Inmates currently are permitted up to three one-on-one, in-person visits per week at the jail. The sessions are 30 minutes.
The new system will allow a group of family members or friends to visit the inmate live through Web cameras up to twice weekly. The 25-minute sessions will cost $15, with about $12.75 of that directed to the county's general fund.
The system, according to the March vote, cost $92,678. Renovo Software of Edina, Minn., is overseeing operations.
Walton said that once the system is up and running, inmate visitations will change to one in-person session at the jail and as many as two video visitations weekly. He believes the video option will relieve long waits at the jail on visit days and fuel costs for families of inmates.
The video visits will be recorded, Walton said. Information will be disseminated to family and friends of inmates before the service begins.
Renatta Signorini is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-837-5374 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.