Mt. Pleasant District to hire 2 police officers to bolster school safety
Mt. Pleasant Area School Board plans to hire two police officers as part of recent efforts to begin a district police force.
During the board's meeting on Monday, President Robert Gumbita said the board will have information on possible officers next week.
“I think everyone will be very happy with them,” he said.
Gumbita announced in May that the board formed a committee in January to look at school safety and security. From there, an ad hoc committee was formed that included a panel of experts such as a prison warden, a police chief and a deputy sheriff.
In the last few months, those individuals toured the schools and put together a list of recommendations that the district might implement.
The agenda for the board's meeting next Monday will be to hire two school police officers as part of the district's new, updated safety and security measures.
Directors also will be asked to approve a list of substitute teachers, to hire a school psychologist, to hire a temporary professional as a school nurse and to hire a secretary to the assistant superintendent.
The board will take action on approving Victor Snyder as an events manager as part of the district's supplemental programs, along with 28 other supplemental contracts ranging from various sports to class-play director and newspaper sponsor.
Directors on Monday also will take action on the district's comprehensive plan effective 2014-17.
Rachel Basinger is a contributing writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.