Latrobe girl, 4, reaches donation goal from 50 states for Alzheimer fundraising success
Two donors in Vermont made for one very excited 4-year-old in Latrobe this weekend.
Lilly Myers, who set out to raise money from all 50 states for Alzheimer's research in honor of “her Nanny,” reached her goal with two donations from Vermont, said her mother, Amy Myers, 35.
In a heartfelt YouTube video, Lilly asked for help in honor of her beloved great-grandmother, Patty Lewis, 82, of Greene County, who has Alzheimer's disease.
Lilly's mother initially thought the child's efforts would garner little more than a few dollars in contributions from relatives.
But in just a month, Lilly has raised $2,562 and counting, far surpassing her original goal of $100. Myers said she knows of at least two other checks en route to the Alzheimer's Association.
“We never imagined it would get this big,” Myers said. She attributed Lilly's success to the power of “that crazy social media.”
As donations came in, Lilly colored in each state on her map of the United States and, when she received donations from abroad — Canada, Germany and Australia — wrote in the names of those countries next to the map.
On Friday night, she finally got to color in Vermont and wanted to make sure her whole family knew it, Myers said.
Lilly's fundraising efforts will continue until the Walk to End Alzheimer's on Sept. 6 at Wana B Park in Carmichaels.
She and some of “Nanny's” other great-grandchildren will set up their lemonade stand, which they've been running at festivals and farmers' markets, at the Carmichaels Coal Show Tuesday through Friday, Myers said.
The children will split the money they raise to apply it to their individual fundraising totals, Myers said.
Kari Andren is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-2856 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.