Share This Page

Western Pa. Operation Nighthawk traffic patrol yields 38 arrests

| Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2014, 10:48 p.m.

The Operation Nighthawk traffic enforcement program held throughout Westmoreland and portions of Allegheny County last weekend resulted in 38 arrests for driving under the influence of alcohol and 19 citations for drivers operating on suspended licenses, state police said.

More than 50 law enforcement officers from local departments in Western Pennsylvania, along with Troop A in Greensburg, Troop B in Uniontown, Troop C in Punxsutawney Troop E in Erie and the state police turnpike detail took part in specialized DUI training and education programs at Westmoreland County Community College.

The officers then took part in traffic patrols from 10 p.m. to 3 a.m. Friday through Saturday morning and again Saturday through Sunday morning, said state police Cpl. David Andrascik.

The program included a presentation on Saturday by family members of Trooper Kenton Iwaniec, who was killed by a drunken driver on March 27, 2008.

Iwaniec, a 2002 graduate of Ligonier Valley High School, was two miles from his Avondale station on his drive home from work when an impaired driver crossed the center line, hit the driver's side of a pickup truck, then hit the trooper's vehicle head-on. Iwaniec, 24, died two hours later in a Delaware hospital.

Andrascik said the traffic enforcement detail yielded 586 vehicle stops, 22 citations for not wearing seat belts, four speeding citations, two underage drinking arrests, 188 traffic citations, 13 criminal arrests and 285 traffic warnings.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.