ShareThis Page

Revenue from Westmoreland County Prison jail video chat falls short

Rich Cholodofsky
| Monday, Jan. 25, 2016, 11:00 p.m.
The Westmoreland County Prison on Jan. 25, 2016.
Sean Stipp | Tribune-Review
The Westmoreland County Prison on Jan. 25, 2016.

A program allowing people to pay to video chat with friends or family who are inmates in the Westmoreland County Prison failed to generate the revenue projected during its first year of operation.

Warden John Walton said Monday that video visits generated just under $14,000 since being made available to the public — about $86,000 less than officials said they expected when the system was put in place in January.

The county paid $92,000 to install nine computers and software that inmates can use for the online video chats. People who call inmates pay $15 for a 25-minute session.

“We thought it would be substantially higher,” Walton said of revenues from the service following a meeting of the county prison board.

An outside company manages the video service and gives a portion of what it collects in fees to the jail. Prison board members said they expected each of the jail's nine computers to register at least two visits every day, but that has not occurred.

Walton said the county averaged about 89 video visits each month through November. The number spiked to 139 video chats during the holiday season in December.

Even though officials were disappointed with the low level of use, they said making video chats available is beneficial because it reduces the number of visitors coming to the jail and lowers the possibility of contraband being smuggled in.

“To me, it was more of a security issue than a money issue,” said Sheriff Jonathan Held, prison board chairman. “In the long run it will pay for itself. If it breaks even or makes a profit, it's a win.”

Until June, the jail allowed inmates three in-person visits each week. The advent of the video visitation system prompted officials to reduce that number and permit one in-person visit and two online sessions weekly. But the change didn't encourage a greater use of the video system, Walton said.

The number of visits might be low in part because three of the computers malfunctioned for several months, Walton said. Numbers might be lower because female inmates unexpectedly haven't used them, he added.

“We put two machines in the female unit, but they're barely used at all,” Walton said.

The warden said computer programmers are working to create an application that will allow video visits to be made from mobile devices such as cellphones and tablets, which could increase usage. The system can now be accessed only through desktop and laptop computers that have high-speed Internet connections.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-830-6293 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.