Giant Eagle executive Shapira named visiting professor at Pitt business schools
Giant Eagle executive David Shapira, a longtime fixture in Pittsburgh business and philanthropic circles, has been named the Visiting H.J. Zoffer Chair in Leadership and Ethics at the University of Pittsburgh, Pitt officials announced Thursday.
Shapira, 74, joined Giant Eagle in 1970 after earning degrees at Oberlin College and Stanford University. In 1980, he was named president and CEO of the company that his grandfather and four other families founded decades earlier. He helped grow Giant Eagle from a regional chain of 50 grocery stores to a major industry player with more than 34,000 employees in more than 420 locations and annual revenues of $9.5 billion.
Today Shapira is executive chair of the board of directors at Giant Eagle.
Pitt officials said Shapira will focus on enhancing academic programs in leadership and ethics and engage with students at the Joseph M. Katz Graduate School of Business and the College of Business Administration in entrepreneurship, supply-chain management, and organizational behavior and human resources.
The Zoffer Chair is named to honor Dean Emeritus H.J. Zoffer, who was dean for more than 28 years and is still on the faculty.
“Mr. Shapira is uniquely qualified to offer expert guidance to our business students on leadership and ethics because he has decades of experience in building ethical organizations and leading philanthropic efforts. His appointment further solidifies our school's efforts to be a partner with the Pittsburgh business community,” said Arjang A. Assad, dean of the Katz graduate school.
Debra Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. She can be reached at 412-320-7996 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.