Artist's album designs became rock icons
FILE - This July 24, 2008 file photo shows English graphic designer Storm Thorgerson standing next to his album cover artwork for Pink Floyd's 'The Dark Side of the Moon' during the opening of his exhibition 'Mind Over Matter: The Images of Pink Floyd' in London. Storm Thorgerson whose eye-catching Pink Floyd and Led Zeppelin album covers captured the spirit of 1970s psychedelia, has died. He was 69. In a statement, Thorgersons family said that he died Thursday April 18, 2013 and that his ending was peaceful and he was surrounded by family and friends. AP Photo
Photo by ap
LONDON — English graphic designer Storm Thorgerson, whose eye-popping album art for Pink Floyd and Led Zeppelin encapsulated the spirit of 1970s psychedelia, died on Thursday. He was 69.
In a statement, Thorgerson's family said that his death “was peaceful and he was surrounded by family and friends.” The statement gave few details but said that the artist, who suffered a stroke in 2003, had been ill for some time.
Even those who are not familiar with Thorgerson's name will have seen his work gracing vinyl collections and CD racks. He was best known for his surreal Pink Floyd covers, which guitarist David Gilmour said had long been “an inseparable part of our work.”
Some of Thorgerson's covers — the disturbing image of a burning man in a business suit featured on Pink Floyd's “Wish You Were Here” or the stark prism on the band's “Dark Side of the Moon” — have become icons in their own right.
Thorgerson made covers for Led Zeppelin, Peter Gabriel, Phish, Styx and Muse. His art tended toward the unsettling or the bizarre. His CD front for The Cranberries' “Bury The Hatchet” featured a monstrous, disembodied eye staring at a crouching, naked figure in a desert.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.