Share This Page

The Thursday wrap

| Wednesday, May 2, 2012, 6:22 p.m.

Barack Obama's 2012 re-election slogan -- "Forward!" -- has long ties to Marxism and socialism, as in "moving forward past capitalism and into socialism and communism," reminds The Washington Times. As disgusting as that is, use of the slogan likely represents the first time the Obama administration has told the truth. ... A new book by Time magazine's Nancy Gibbs says former Presidents George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton share something other than raising money for good causes. She says they share a disdain for Jimmy Carter conducting foreign policy after he left office and without any authority from the White House. Former staffers even use the word "treason," notes the New York Post. We're glad to see everybody's finally getting up to speed on Mr. Carter. ... There's a glut of pork again in the United States. Pig populations are at record highs. Demand is down. Prices are falling. No doubt, your federal government will figure out a way to once again "help" the pork industry and perpetuate this insane cycle by throwing further subsidies at the pork industry. ... Still looking for relevance , vanquished GOP presidential wannabe Rick Santorum is scheduled to be on Jay Leno next Tuesday night. Some advice for Mr. Santorum: Avoid the phrase "Man on dog."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.