TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Byrd's-eye view of Dems dim

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Off Road Politics connects Washington with Main Street hosted by Salena Zito and Lara Brown PhD. Exclusive radio show on @TribLIVE

Podcasts
  • Loading...

Daily Photo Galleries

Sunday, June 10, 2012, 10:40 a.m.
 

This longtime Democrat left his party after it demanded that he sign a pledge to support only its candidates.

Local and national Democrats branded him as an extremist, out of touch with constituents; the press judged him to be "dead meat" in the 1970 campaign to win back his U.S. Senate seat.

Undeterred, Harry Byrd Jr. -- namesake son of the legendary boss of Virginia's then-dominant Democrats -- beat the odds and won re-election. Not once but twice.

"It was a contentious time," Byrd now says. "Then again, everyone thinks they are living in the most contentious times ever. Well, they really aren't, are they?"

The longest-living former senator at age 97, Byrd still resides in his hometown of Winchester, Va., within walking distance of one of his beloved newspapers, The Winchester Star.

He served eight terms in Virginia's Senate before being appointed to his ailing father's U.S. Senate seat. He won that seat outright a year later, but the undercurrents of change already were building among Democrats.

"Liberals began ... winning local elections in the primaries over moderate and fiscally conservative Democrats," Byrd said of that shift. "You could just see it coming in successive primary elections, and that was in the '60s.

"Now, the party is barely recognizable."

He scoffs at the notion that this is the country's worst-ever time, but passionately agrees we're heading in a dangerous direction.

He served in the Senate under four U.S. presidents; he was close friends with Johnson, Nixon, Ford and Reagan, liked Clinton, but "never much cared for Carter."

After his switch to independent, he still caucused with Senate Democrats but "no one ever took my vote for granted." A staunch fiscal conservative, he introduced balanced-budget legislation four years in a row requiring that "total outlays of the federal government shall not exceed its receipts," he said. "Congress approved it, then promptly ignored it."

"Everyone regarded Sen. Byrd as a true independent," recalled Donald Ritchie, the Senate's official historian. "He changed his party during a very transitional period. It was not a peaceful time or a quiet time but no one disrespected his decision."

Byrd is an American treasure; what he did in 1970 was courageous. He saw his party's future as unacceptable, so he took a stand.

Back then, no one "tweeted" support. No cable-TV pundit rose as his advocate. No panel of experts agonized over what he should do, and no "super PAC" was in his corner, crafting clever messages.

He bucked the party machine that his late father once controlled and under which he matured politically -- not an easy course.

Democrats assumed he needed them to win, he said, insisting he needed the support of labor and blacks, the party's key constituencies. Yet their strength turned out to be all noise, no substance.

Republicans considered taking him as their candidate but fielded one of their own.

"The party insisted I depend on them," Byrd said. "I depended on the voters' common sense."

He bet that voters would show allegiance to common sense, too -- and he won, based on his record, his reputation and his understanding that people were not as aligned with parties as most experts assumed.

The Byrd family has been in the newspaper business since 1860, and "politics and newspapers are my passions," he said. He watched with fascination this year's primary process.

"I do believe that the Republicans went with the man who they believed would best handle the economy for the country," he said. "I, for one, think they were right."

He supports Republican Mitt Romney over Democrat Barack Obama, despite his love for what his old party once stood for.

"My father was adamant about fiscal discipline," he said. "So was I. I still am.

"Obama is a very skilled speaker," he continued. "In that, he has a gift. But I believe that the country needs a skilled leader who understands the nuances of generating jobs and all that goes with that -- one who understands the importance of fiscal discipline.

"That is Mitt Romney."

He chuckles at those who talk about Washington being more broken than ever, or about unrest dividing Americans.

"I guess they never heard of the '60s -- in both centuries," he said.

Salena Zito covers politics for the Trib. Call her at 412-320-7879. Email her at: szito@tribweb.com

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Penguins notebook: After reinterpreting rule, draft pick sought for Bylsma’s hiring
  2. NFL notebook: Broncos left tackle Clady tears ACL, likely out for season
  3. Dormont man missing since Wednesday found dead at Station Square
  4. ‘Healthy Foods for Men’ lecture set for Wexford pavilion
  5. Sabres hire Bylsma as coach; Penguins receive 3rd-round pick
  6. Pirates’ Morton hopes he’s past injury-riddled part of career
  7. Taliani’s 3 homers propel Deer Lakes to 2nd WPIAL softball title in 4 seasons
  8. Healthy defensive back Mitchell eager for 2nd season with Steelers
  9. Penguins GM Rutherford ‘wouldn’t make’ Despres trade today
  10. Gorman: Team Dugan gets gold, like a champ
  11. Belle Vernon scores 4 runs in wild 7th inning to capture WPIAL title