A church in crisis
A series of scandals (not including priestly pedophilia) suggests the Catholic Church faces a larger, overarching crisis — one that begs the question of whether Pope Benedict XVI is up to the task of leadership.
There's the late-May arrest of the pope's butler for allegedly smuggling documents out of the private papal quarters. But that hasn't stopped further “Vatileaks” of information damaging to the pope's private secretary and the Vatican secretary of State.
There's the archbishop reassigned in October — as ambassador in Washington, far from the Vatican — after antagonizing what the German website Spiegel Online calls “old boys' networks” by curbing waste and abuse in contracting.
There's the ouster in May of the Vatican bank head who tried to increase transparency at an institution known for keeping Mafia money safe.
And there's Benedict, 85, the oldest pope in 109 years. He's finding if increasingly difficult to speak, walk — and, insiders say, lead.
“The Vatican is disintegrating into dozens of competing interest groups,” stifling reform as clerical communities jockey for influence today and in the next pope's selection, Spiegel Online reports.
Business as usual? We hope not. But if it is, dare we say it the Roman Catholic Church is not sustainable.
If Pope Benedict's successor similarly fails to lead and to reform the Vatican, scandals will continue to plague Roman Catholicism and the church surely will implode.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.