ShareThis Page

Eric Holder's contempt: 'Scoundrelous' behavior

| Friday, June 29, 2012, 9:01 p.m.

The practical effect of Congress finding Attorney General Eric Holder in criminal and civil contempt for his stonewalling in its investigation of the Operation Fast and Furious gun-running scandal is a mixed bag.

The criminal case now is referred to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Washington, D.C., for prosecution. And given that federal prosecutors fall under the purview of the Justice Department that Mr. Holder heads, well, you get the picture.

But the civil contempt case won't face such a hurdle. It has teeth and likely will result in a long, if not revealing, court battle that will leave deep bite marks.

It is no small matter to become the first sitting Cabinet member to be found in contempt. But Holder reacted as Holder reacts worst — by rationalizing and obfuscating the real issue.

Where Congress (Republicans and a growing number of Democrats) properly see their constitutional duty to provide executive branch oversight, Holder shouts “POLITICS!” ­— which typically is the last refuge of scoundrels caught in what's turning out to be a massive web of prevarications.

Equally “scoundrelous” were efforts by some Democrats to paint the contempt vote as “racist” efforts to “suppress the vote” this fall.

We've long held that Eric Holder should resign. We still hold that view. And it likely will be the only way to get to the bottom of a very sad chapter in American history.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.