Share This Page

Union stalking

| Sunday, Sept. 2, 2012, 8:56 p.m.

Helping to put the “thug” in union thuggery, Pennsylvania and at least three other states grant Big Labor certain “exemptions” to stalking and trespassing laws, trampling what should be clearly defined citizen protections against harassment, according to a new report by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Since when are state laws conditional upon who violates them? Apparently, since labor uses its political muscle to mitigate these laws in Illinois, California, Nevada and Pennsylvania.

As detailed in “Sabotage, Stalking & Stealth Exemptions: Special State Laws for Labor Unions,” all states have penalties against stalking. But in the Keystone State, for example, the law “shall not apply to conduct by a party to a labor dispute,” the chamber reports.

Consider the “campaign” by the Philadelphia construction unions against Post Brothers Apartments in that city. Allegedly, the pregnant wife of one of the company's owners “is routinely followed taking their toddler to preschool by picketers,” according to Post Brothers.

And trespassing in California? That's OK, too. The chamber reports that police refused to remove union members who allegedly harassed customers outside a Ralphs grocery store, even though the reported confrontations occurred on a store-owned sidewalk.

Such legal leeway for unions to apply harassment and even intimidation is inexcusable and must be purged from state laws.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.