TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

The voter ID ruling: The franchise wins

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Thursday, Aug. 16, 2012, 1:30 p.m.
 

It didn't take long for the whiners, wieners and warblers to whack Commonwealth Court Judge Robert Simpson's refusal to block Pennsylvania's voter ID law as being something other than a ruling based on rock-solid legal precedents.

One outfit even smeared him as an “ideologue” employing “ideologically based” precedents.

But it's this simple:

Pennsylvania's photo Voter ID law, Act 18, “is a reasonable, non-discriminatory, non-severe burden when viewed in the broader context of the widespread use of photo ID in daily life” and those who oppose it did not establish “that disenfranchisement was immediate or inevitable.”

The fact of the matter is, it will be pretty darn easy to vote in Pennsylvania under the new law. If you don't have the prerequisite identification, it can be obtained free of charge. And even if a voter lacks the proper ID, a provisional ballot can be cast and counted if that ID is presented in short order.

“The burdens associated with Act 18,” slight as they are, “serve substantial interests to protect the integrity and reliability of the electoral process,” Judge Simpson wrote.

And given the facts of this case, it should be quite apparent to all that the whiners, wieners and warblers fear the law and the end of loosey-goosey standards for that very reason.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Inside the Steelers: Rookie linebacker Chickillo continues to excel
  2. Police: Escaped Armstrong County inmate armed, dangerous homicide suspect
  3. Pirates bolster bullpen by trading for former closer Soria
  4. Bubble soccer bounces its way into Western Pa. sports venues
  5. Since 1969, Pine resident Fitzgerald’s garden has flourished
  6. Fashion FYI: RAW: Pittsburgh showcase features over 40 artists
  7. Stocks bounce back from big losses to close relatively flat
  8. Starkey: Garoppolo baffles Steelers
  9. Pirates notebook: Blanton introduced; Worley designated for assignment
  10. Passing the illegals buck
  11. Confirm Judge Restrepo