Mandatory flu shots
With the flu season rapidly approaching, the issue is raised again if there should be mandatory flu vaccinations for health-care employees.
According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, more than 200,000 Americans are hospitalized with the flu each year. The workers who directly care for these patients are both exposed to the illness and potential transmitters to other patients.
Research from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services shows that the flu vaccination is safe and its benefits far outweigh the risks.
As a family nurse practitioner student, I believe that this is a huge public health concern. Mandating flu vaccination for all direct-care workers is reasonable. Failure to mandate vaccination is a silent endorsement of a potentially catastrophic pandemic such as the 1918 “Spanish Flu,” when 500 million were infected worldwide.
The reality is most of us are one paycheck or diagnosis away from poverty. It is unfortunate that many people have to work while they are sick just to make ends meet, but owing an electric bill or a car payment is not worth the life of a vulnerable patient.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Steelers clinch playoff berth with win over Chiefs
- Steelers notebook: Gay respects ‘anything’ referees call
- Starkey: Chryst a miserable failure at Pitt
- NFL notebook: Manziel leaves game with hamstring injury
- Exit poll: Ex-regime official Essebsi is Tunisia’s new president
- Hurricanes’ Staal could return shortly after Christmas
- Groom cited at Farmington wedding reception being filmed for reality TV show
- Arrests made in Pakistan school massacre
- Ex-Penguins defenseman Niskanen still miffed by coaches’ firings
- Fatal fire under investigation in New Castle
- Pitt football fights to overcome steppingstone status