Why wait for the election?
What are we waiting for? An election to settle what? This nation has an emergency. We're crawling toward a fiscal cliff. An election won't stop us from falling off it. To avoid it, we need Congress to live up to its responsibility and act for the good of the nation, not lobbyists and special interests.
Unless Congress acts, on Jan. 2, 2013 there will be automatic, huge austerity cuts across the board. Those, along with the expiration of Bush-era tax cuts (as well as other economic triggers), could send the economy into a tailspin. Unemployment benefits for millions still eager to get back to work are also scheduled to expire.
Yet Congress adjourned this past week to go home and campaign. It's the earliest Congress has adjourned in 50 years. Fifty years. Its members left behind critical business.
Republican and Democratic strategists rely on the fact that voters have short memories. Professional journalists and pollsters remember, but the rest of us forget. We shouldn't — and perhaps a few of our local papers will remind us not to forget Congress left town before completing its homework assignment.
Akron Beacon Journal editorial: “Predictably enough, lawmakers left town amid the familiar partisan acrimony, driven more than anything by Republican obstruction, that has resulted in such an unproductive two years on Capitol Hill.”
Baltimore Sun editorial: “These (congresspeople) must be the lazy, entitled victims on the government dole that Mitt Romney was talking about.”
New York Times editorial: “The 112th Congress has earned a reputation for monumental ... toxic paralysis. Unyielding Republican obstructionism is the root of this dysfunction.”
It wasn't for lack of effort and compromise that President Obama was unable to move the 112th Congress. Not even House Speaker John Boehner could command his own Republican House.
For a couple of decades now, moderates have been lost in both parties, although according to several studies, the Democratic Party at least still has room for them. The same nonpartisan studies provide compelling evidence that the Republican Party has moved the farthest from the middle, nestling into bed with the rigidly ideological right. Thus, Democrats in the Senate simply don't have enough votes to break the filibuster.
So we have a paralysis in Washington. It should come as no surprise that a large part of the dysfunction of our Congress has been the result of a deliberate strategy to score partisan points at a time when a large segment of our population are calling for an end to partisan bickering.
The Republican-led House of Representatives adjourned first. The Democratic-led Senate adjourned because any action it took must also pass the House. Now, the House is in pro-forma session — brief meetings where nothing gets done. But some lawmakers are still using this time to press for action.
I doubt the Congress will act. But you, the voters, could judge that the real problem lies in our dysfunctional capital of Washington, where our elected servants are so unyielding that nothing can get done.
It's your turn to get Congress back to work or force them to remain home, where some — perhaps most — of them belong.
Donna Brazile is a senior Democratic strategist, a political commentator and contributor to CNN and ABC News.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pitt’s challenge: Contani Miami’s Johnson, Dorsett
- OPEC decision on crude sets small producers on perilous path, analysts say
- NFL notebook: Browns’ Manziel says he tried to avoid altercation
- Fewer Dems to fight for ObamaCare
- Inside the National Cathedral ‘prayer service’
- Steelers notebook: Defense has a retro feel
- U.S.-backed rebels push forward in southern Syria
- Penguins notebook: Malkin clicking on power play
- The AG-designate: Tough questions for Loretta Lynch
- Moral confusion in Ferguson
- Fair funding for schools