TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Water plant costs to be high

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Letter to the Editor
Saturday, Oct. 13, 2012, 8:59 p.m.
 

The Cheswick Council is significantly underestimating the costs of refurbishing the borough's defunct water-treatment plant.

My preliminary estimate indicates that refurbishing and operating the water plant will cost at least $5.5 million over the next 15 years — about $1.7 million of that for capital costs, including engineering, equipment and storage tanks.

This would require a loan, which may not be available.

To cover the costs, the water price for Cheswick's 800-plus residential customers will be at least $7.60 per 1,000 gallons. This does not include any additional costs due to requirements from the state Department of Environmental Protection or emergency situations that may arise.

Resurrecting the water plant appears to be the highest cost option available.

For comparison, had the current council approved purchasing water from neighboring Oakmont, the price would have been closer to $5.60 per 1,000 gallons, less than the approximately $7 per 1,000 we're currently paying for water from Harmar.

These are preliminary estimates, but they point out the continuing need for better planning and assessment by our council to provide Cheswick residents the best quality water — at the most affordable price — over the long term.

Paul P. Jack

Cheswick

The writer is a civil engineer and a former Cheswick councilman.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Penguins trade Sutter to Canucks, sign free agent center Fehr
  2. Brady’s suspension upheld by Goodell
  3. Five Baldwin men face trial for severely beating black man
  4. Videos spur dozens to protest outside Pittsburgh Planned Parenthood
  5. Steelers RB Archer trying to catch up after tough rookie season
  6. Bloomfield Bridge lanes to be closed starting Wednesday
  7. Judge lets New Kensington Ten Commandments monument stand
  8. Inside the Steelers: Ventrone suffers right ankle injury
  9. U.S. Steel joins major producers in new dumping complaint
  10. Le’Veon Bell’s suspension cut by one game
  11. Indiana County hazmat crews treat nearly two dozen workers for cadmium exposure at Homer City plant