Vote like a Catholic
Published: Sunday, Nov. 4, 2012, 8:52 p.m.
In 2008, 54 percent of Catholics did not vote for Catholic values and helped Barack Obama become president. Shame on them.
If the law allowed the U.S. bishops to endorse presidential candidates, they would say there are five reasons why voting for President Obama is gravely immoral, intrinsically evil and contrary to Roman Catholic faith — abortion, euthanasia, embryonic stem cell research, human cloning and homosexual marriage.
Obama is rated 100 percent by NARAL, an abortion-on-demand defense group and Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion provider. He is rated zero by National Right to Life. He supports Roe vs. Wade.
There are some issues faithful Catholics can disagree over if they involve things that are not intrinsically evil, but are matters of prudential judgment. But when it comes to intrinsically evil actions, we should not support candidates who support them. Our priest has explained the moral principles of these issues so we can be faithful Catholics.
But unlike our bishops and priests, I can proudly proclaim, “I'm Catholic And I Vote.” I vote Republican to support Catholic values. Will you?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- McCutchen proposes to girlfriend on DeGeneres show
- Starkey: NHL stuck in stone age
- Police: Driver fell unconscious before Seton Hill bus crash
- Steelers defense’s rapid decline looks similar to that of Steel Curtain’s
- PNC plans to do away with tellers
- Indiana County man ordered to trial in shooting of Derry woman in her home
- Penguins’ Neal apologizes, vows to be better
- Steelers notebook: Roethlisberger comes to Haley defense again
- Pirates general manager Huntington is searching for right player, deal
- Highmark health plan enrollment skyrockets from Healthcare.gov
- Aliquippa’s Fields commits to WVU