America didn't lose I
The post-election editorial headlined “Obama wins: America loses (again)” (Nov. 7 and TribLIVE.com) prompts me to respond as to who really lost.
A record turnout in so-called battleground states demonstrated a backlash against those who acted to suppress voting by limiting early voting and challenging qualified voters.
Intimidation didn't work and neither did (sorry, state Rep. Mike Turzai) requiring poll workers to ask for IDs.
It certainly didn't help Gov. Romney win Pennsylvania.
The tea party lost where it supported U.S. Senate candidates who won primaries in Indiana and Missouri but lost winnable races in both states.
For the second consecutive election cycle, candidates were rejected as being too extreme (think Christine O'Donnell in Delaware and Sharron Angle in Nevada in 2010).
Ignorance lost, as those who believe President Barack Obama is not U.S.-born (think Donald Trump), that he is a Muslim or a socialist or worse, can now slither back under their rocks.
Racism in its ugliest forms lost. Xenophobes must cringe while Latino populations vote in increasing numbers. Remarks by Romney surrogate and former New Hampshire Gov. John Sununu about that great American Colin Powell were disgusting.
So did America lose, as the Trib opines? This proud American disagrees.
My confidence in straight-thinking American voters soars.
Glenn R. Plummer
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.