Share This Page

The Thursday wrap

| Wednesday, Nov. 14, 2012, 8:53 p.m.

“Gloom, Boom and Doom Report” author Marc Faber is predicting a massive market meltdown. But don't blame Greece or the “fiscal cliff” for what he says will be a 20-percent drop in stock values. Mr. Faber says corporate profits will “disappoint” and the global economy will stagnate. If mattress sales increase and investors start stuffing them with cash, you'll know Faber's on to something. ... Demographer Nicholas Eberstadt says that in 1935, “welfare state transfers” were 3 percent of the economy. Today, says the American Enterprise Institute scholar, they are nearly 20 percent. Yet another manifestation of contemporary “progressivism.” ... The European Union has scrapped its plan to charge airlines worldwide that visit the European continent a “carbon tax.” That, just as American leaders are getting ready to discuss implementing an overall tax on carbon. Critics, the United States among them, said the tax would have eviscerated national sovereignty. Can't wait to see how European countries doing business in the United States react to an American carbon tax. ... The Russian news outlet RIA Novosti intimates that President Obama soon will visit Russian President Vladimir Putin. You'll recall that Bam told Vlad in one of those pesky “open-mic moments” that should he be re-elected, he'd have more “flexibility” in missile-defense discussions. “Flexibility,” as per usual, is a euphemism for “capitulation.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.