Share This Page

Aiding Sandy's victims I

| Sunday, Nov. 18, 2012, 8:50 p.m.

The ignorance of Jay Lynch's letter “Big government to the rescue” (Nov. 11 and TribLIVE.com) is simply offensive. The people of New York and New Jersey have no option but to turn to government and the unions for help; these are not right-to-work areas.

Workers from right-to-work states spent countless hours driving to New Jersey, only to be stopped by union workers. Imagine coming to help people in need, only to get called offensive names and told to turn around by the people you came to help.

The mayor of New York waited until the last hour to cancel the marathon — a no-brainer considering the starting point was devastated by the storm. For days, thousands of bottles of water stayed in storage and generators sat idle.

And then there's FEMA closing its doors because of (drumroll, please) the weather! FEMA was created for these specific events!

No one talks about the hundreds of lifesaving operations done every day by nonunion doctors, or the manufacturing, mining and power generation that occurs in nonunion facilities, which far outnumber union facilities.

Beating your chest for unions and government during a disaster like this serves no purpose, especially when ignoring the facts.

David Razorsek

South Park

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.