Had it with hypocrisy
Had it with hypocrisy
Thank you for publishing Joseph Sabino Mistick's column “What's next for Republicans?” (Nov. 11 and TribLIVE.com). I enjoy reading his contributions because they are so entertaining.
After all, he is speaking for Western Pennsylvania liberals in a conservative newspaper. Sometimes, I am dumbstruck that people actually believe the things he says.
It is true that the Republicans are in big trouble. If they do not make some serious changes, there will be no more Republican Party.
Just as the Democrats cannot conceive of such abstract concepts as the consequences of abysmal debt, the Republicans are blind to their own impending destiny.
What made me write this letter, though, is Mistick's use of the word “intolerance.” What I am becoming intolerant of is the hypocrisy.
Democrats are as intolerant of Republicans as Republicans are of Democrats. It is difficult to think differently about “them” when the government and the media promote such bitter feelings among people. Readers should consider political divisions within their own families.
If those in office really cared about shared virtues and all the cherished principles on which our country was founded, we the people would be happier, living self-fulfilled lives unfettered by outside influences.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.