Higher taxes? Do the math
I've been reading — utterly perplexed — some of your letters. “My freedom of speech is being taken away,” yet the woman said it. For the last four years, I have heard President Obama is taking away their guns, yet they still have them.
I have to listen to people tell me what the president is now doing. I never knew so many local people worked for the government and had such high security clearances that they know exactly what is going on in highest levels of our government.
When I complained about President G.W. Bush, I was told that I didn't have to like him, but I needed to respect him because he was the president. These same people now spew such hatred for Obama. These supposed good Christians are so venomous, I wonder what Christian beliefs they follow.
How did everyone forget that G.W. left this country in financial distress because of the wars he put on credit cards? They blame our president for not turning around the country in four years with zero cooperation from Congress.
Now the battle is raising taxes on those earning $250,000 or more. They may be paying an additional $6,000 a year. Do I feel bad for them? Not on your life.
They are making approximately $4,808 per week. In 2012, they paid 4.2 percent toward Social Security, but that tax ended when they reached $110,000 — 23 weeks. So starting the 24th week, they got a weekly “raise” from the government of $202. Multiply $202 times 29 weeks and that's $5,858. In reality, their tax bill would increase by $142.
As Joe Friday said on “Dragnet”: “Just the facts, ma'am.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.