Corbett must deliver 'big play'
It's halftime of Gov. Tom Corbett's four-year term, and while he's kept promises of on-time, balanced budgets and no tax hikes, he needs to deliver a “big play” — preferably several — in the second half.
That lack of a signature accomplishment for the GOP reform agenda is puzzling for a Republican governor whose party controls the House and Senate. He says long-overdue privatization of wine and spirits sales is a top second-half priority, along with funding multibillion-dollar transportation infrastructure needs.
Gov. Corbett's second-half game plan also targets skyrocketing state pension costs. Addressing that issue must include switching new hires from traditional defined-benefit plans to 401(k)-style defined-contribution plans.
But what of other necessary, fundamental reforms, such as doing away with publicly funded construction's prevailing-wage rules and “project labor agreements” that hike taxpayers' costs and deny nonunion workers jobs?
The voters who put Corbett in the governor's mansion expect a wide range of reforms to remedy Pennsylvania's nanny-state, big-government, tax-and-spend ways — expectations heightened by GOP control of the Legislature.
The clock is ticking. The governor has what he needs to dominate in the second half, but as in football, “on paper” is one thing, executing on the field another. If Pennsylvanians are to win, he must make those big plays to cross critical items off his extensive second-half “to do” list.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.