TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

The best way to rein in the Pa. Legislature: Follow the Constitution

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Saturday, March 9, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
 

HARRISBURG

There's no warrant in the Pennsylvania Constitution allowing state legislators to have taxpayer-paid vehicles. Neither does it say they can receive health or life insurance or $160 per diems when they show up for work.

The state charter also does not provide for current and former members of the 253-member General Assembly, largest among “full-time” legislatures, to receive state pensions that average $31,000 a year and can top six figures for those serving long enough.

The state Constitution says nothing at all about the state cars afforded to legislators costing more than $7,000 a year or taxpayers paying $3.9 million for per diems in 2011-12.

And very clearly, it does not say legislators may collect a “COLA” — a cost of living adjustment that gives them a pay raise each year.

Here's what the Constitution does say:

The members of the General Assembly shall receive such salary and mileage for regular and special sessions as shall be fixed by law, and no other compensation whatever , whether for service upon committee or otherwise. No member of either House shall during the term for which he may have been elected, receive any increase of salary , or mileage, under any law passed during such term.

That language was part of the Constitution adopted in 1874. Granted, that was a year Jesse James was robbing trains in the West when modern cars and comprehensive health care did not exist.

But the Constitution says what it says.

And all of the benefits not described in the Constitution are legal according to several rulings by the Pennsylvania courts, the latest by the Supreme Court in 2009.

Reformer and rabble-rouser Gene Stilp filed a lawsuit to have the numerous perks declared unconstitutional.

His lawsuit was struck down by the Supreme Court, the same court that gets its annual funding from the Legislature and the same court that some say conspired in 2005 to arrange the middle-of-the-night pay grab (which eventually only the judicial branch continued to receive).

Stilp's argument was described as an “absolutist view.” A constitutional provision “is to be interpreted in terms of its spirit and intentions,” the court wrote. The court won't invalidate such benefits of another branch of government “unless it clearly, palpably and plainly violates the Constitution.”

Never mind that the language clearly does go well beyond the Constitution.

Can you imagine the havoc that would have been created if the court had agreed with Stilp? Legislators would have had to give up the cars and charge only mileage. They'd have been scrambling to find private health insurance. Because they couldn't have afforded to stay over in the capital without per diems, lawmakers would have prevailed on leadership to meet as little as possible, maybe a month a year.

That would have had the effect of returning to a part-time legislature. The now-$83,000-a-year salary would have been so outrageous to constituents, for so little work, that a pay cut would have been in order.

Imagine that.

Brad Bumsted is the state Capitol reporter for Trib Total Media (717-787-1405 or bbumsted@tribweb.com).

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. McCullers’, McLendon’s prowess in clogging trenches crucial to Steelers defense
  2. Steelers swap draft pick for Eagles cornerback
  3. Rossi: Looking at the next great Steeler
  4. After early criticism, Haley has Steelers offense poised to be even better
  5. Reds solve Cole, stave off Pirates’ 9th-inning rally
  6. Former South Park coach Loughran optimistic about Fox Chapel’s prospects
  7. O’Neil jumps right in to AD duties at Kiski Area
  8. Pirates notebook: New acquisition Happ more than happy to fill spot in rotation
  9. Roman Catholic Church in midst of culture clash over gays
  10. Rainy summer delays paving projects in New Kensington
  11. Penguins not alone in top-heavy approach to salary cap